Toggle navigation. Utah State University Associate of Applied Science Degree Nursing Program Systematic Plan of Evaluation Standard 6: Outcomes Program evaluation demonstrates that students have achieved each end-of-program student learning outcome and each program outcome.
The nursing program has a current systematic plan of evaluation that contains: specific, measurable expected levels of achievement; appropriate assessment methods; regular intervals for assessment; sufficient data to inform program decision-making for maintenance and improvement; analysis of assessment data to inform program decision-making; and documentation demonstrating use of assessment data in program decision-making.
Criterion 6. The composite score for the cohort in the Physiological Adaptation category on the ATI Comprehensive Predictor examination will be at or above the national mean. The composite score for the cohort in the Pharmacological and Parenteral Therapies category on the ATI Comprehensive Predictor examination will be at or above the national mean. The composite score for the cohort in the Safety and Infection Control category on the ATI Comprehensive Predictor examination will be at or above the national mean.
The composite score for the cohort in the Basic Care and Comfort category on the ATI Comprehensive Predictor examination will be at or above the national mean. The composite score for the cohort in the Reduction of Risk category on the ATI Comprehensive Predictor examination will be at or above the national mean. Composite scores are the group means aggregated for all program locations. There is ongoing assessment of the extent to which the students complete the nursing program.
Component Frequency Method of Assessment Program completion rates Annually in May NA and faculty review of program completion database by date of entering cohort. End-of-program SLOs: 1.
Critical Thinking. Completion of spring semester May Annually for 3 years: , , Year 4: End-of-program SLO: 2. End-of-Program SLO: 3. End-of-Program SLO: 4. J Prof Nurs , 21 1 , 01 Jan Cited by: 18 articles PMID: Cited by: 3 articles PMID: J Nurs Educ , 40 8 , 01 Nov Cited by: 23 articles PMID: Nurse Educ Today , 25 4 , 29 Mar Cited by: 16 articles PMID: Contact us.
Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively. Recent Activity. Search life-sciences literature Over 39 million articles, preprints and more Search Advanced search. This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy. Search articles by 'S Failla'.
Failla S 1 ,. Maher MA ,. Duffy CA. Affiliations 1 author 1. Share this article Share with email Share with twitter Share with linkedin Share with facebook. The curricula of these programs are designed to prepare graduates to competently provide direct patient care.
The purpose of this descriptive comparative study was to evaluate the nursing performance of ADN graduates as perceived by graduates, faculty, and employers. Six months later, the graduates again were asked to complete the same questionnaire along with their employers.
Findings indicated a significant difference in the planning and evaluation performance of graduates at graduation and 6 months later as perceived by the graduates. Graduates rated themselves significantly higher in all areas of performance when compared to faculty and employers. There was no significant difference in the perception of graduate performance between faculty and employers. This outcome assessment provides needed data on perceptions of ADN programs.
The use of scoring rubrics to determine clinical performance in the operating suite. Dispelling desperation in nursing education. Similar Articles To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Performance expectations of the associate degree nurse graduate within the first six months. Student and faculty perceptions of effective clinical instructors in ADN programs. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs - a review and a strategy for follow up.
0コメント